EmailDiscussions.com

EmailDiscussions.com (http://www.emaildiscussions.com/index.php)
-   The Technical Zone... (http://www.emaildiscussions.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Spam but not (http://www.emaildiscussions.com/showthread.php?t=73933)

CyberDyne 9 Sep 2018 05:00 AM

Spam but not
 
Could anyone peruse these headers and maybe throw some light on why they would only warrant a -4 score please?
Many thanks

Code:

Return-Path: <N.White-richard=c****s.com@ll**dsbankbacs.com>
Received: from ll**dsbankbacs.com (196.154.21.46.static.swif*way.net [46.21.154.196]) by galaxy.thinking*ish.com with SMTP;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:12:49 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=key; d=ll**dsbankbacs.com;
h=Mime-Version:To:Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Message-ID;
bh=EOJ5sdf+KNjA9YuR7BpjEu08bL8=;
b=1rev6uEyjTY4D9YTapVj3GqLrclpeYN0rcp8o0zMir9KXp5ei9RCAbeKEKtkgI+t4VEGK5I5LEJm
3QZcurXmVHCOEw7j3an7ZvZwYDCxyhecsjOUPcyfGWenymO+Z9NcAM/ld1Y2311u6MHO6ZWSgO2P
KmrII/sahsacXTIji/Q=
Received: by ll**dsbankbacs.com id hgvfqqmdero7 for <richard@c****s.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:04:28 -0400 (envelope-from <N.White-richard=c****s.com@ll**dsbankbacs.com>)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: richard@c****s.com
Subject: Please find attached your incoming BACs documents.
From: "Natalie White" <N.White@ll**dsbankbacs.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:04:28 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=a5e0da94bfbcecccf46ee212d82b4e45
Message-ID: <0.0.3.1.1D440599A072D6C.A525793@ll**dsbankbacs.com>
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_Pass, Reverse DNS Lookup [Passed], ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_Pass
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: -4


janusz 10 Sep 2018 07:02 PM

The score depends not only on the headers, but also on the body.
Besides, the "penalty points" are configurable, and the email provider could have done anything (sensible of otherwise) to tweak them..


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Copyright EmailDiscussions.com 1998-2022. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy