Quote:
Of course, the issue needs to be fixed, but at least this provides additional evidence of what is going on, as well as a simple way of getting around the problem should it rear its ugly head. |
Makes sense.
I think it's reasonable to just wait for the code that's on the beta server that fixes the problem to go live. I think that's what the developers have decided, and I'd make the same choice. A code migration specifically to fix this isn't worth it. Better spending the time on other things. We have 2 good workarounds. Bummer for folks who get an uninformative error message and don't discover a workaround. |
I don't know if there's any connection but I'm also having problems Sending email via the new UI
http://www.emaildiscussions.com/show...905#post601905 |
We got a support ticket about this and the user pointed to this post. So I thought I'll make an update here as well.
There is currently a known issue that sometimes causes the error: Quote:
An immediate fix for this is non-trivial, however, we will be rolling out an update later this year that should fix this. Until then, as a work around, if you hit this error, you can:
You should then be able to send the email. |
Quote:
|
Try putting in a .
|
Quote:
Didn’t help. |
Ran into this yet again the other day on iPhone. Tried the mentioned workarounds and again they didn't work. Eventually worked after I tried a dozen or so times: tweak, save, attempt, repeat.
Can someone (from FastMail) provide an ETA on when this fix 'll get rolled out more precise than "later this year"? I didn't think to test the fix for when I ran into email drafts for which the workaround doesn't work. Will next time. |
I ran into this again (in Opera on Sierra). I tried logging in to the beta server to see if it was fixed there. It is NOT FIXED in beta.:confused:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://twitter.com/EMDiscussions/with_replies Hopefully, those that subscribe to that Twitter page can see the spammers names - and may save them from inadvertently replying to them. I've stopped reporting their posts to the mods as they don't see these types of post as spam. Assumption edited: But some may know it for what it is. |
Quote:
Maybe I'm being thick, but I'm puzzled. It seems entirely pointless to me. Please can you explain? |
Quote:
That was a sweeping assumption, that upon reflection, was obviously not correct. Apologies. I've edited that post for clarity |
Quote:
There is something very odd about that contentless post by "ScottRob", but it doesn't have a link in it, so it can't advertise or phish. Why would anyone go to the trouble of setting up a bot to post such things? It's a question that has long puzzled me. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +9. The time now is 05:00 AM. |
Copyright EmailDiscussions.com 1998-2022. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy