Forum: FastMail Forum
20 Dec 2006, 07:05 PM
|
Replies: 18
Views: 912
Suggestion: Remove tag when reporting "non-spam"
I realize that "report non-spam" does not do anything for now, other than moving the message back to the inbox.
It would be really nice if the "{SPAM xx.x}" tag could be removed from the subject...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
18 May 2006, 05:49 PM
|
Replies: 23
Views: 7,554
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
2 Jan 2006, 05:05 PM
|
Replies: 1
Views: 589
|
Forum: Runbox Forum
26 Nov 2005, 05:59 AM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1,616
|
Forum: Runbox Forum
25 Nov 2005, 08:42 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1,616
Thanks for this info.
Now, how do I get past...
Thanks for this info.
Now, how do I get past having to click on the "This page contains both secure and nonsecure..." dialog each time I log in secure, i.e. at https://secure.runbox.com.
The...
|
Forum: Runbox Forum
25 Nov 2005, 04:11 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1,616
In my book, what you write is a definition of...
In my book, what you write is a definition of "spying code" (I did notice the smiley...)
Furthermore, there is a cookie that is only written to my disk if I answer yes to the dialog mentioned above....
|
Forum: Runbox Forum
25 Nov 2005, 03:36 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1,616
Spy code from Google
A new thing when I go to https://secure.runbox.com is that I get a pop-up saying that "This page conatins bioth secure and nonsecure items." etc.
Why is that? Is it because of the Google user spying...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
15 Nov 2005, 04:03 PM
|
Replies: 46
Views: 7,730
So, what if you combine this solution, which I...
So, what if you combine this solution, which I also use, with an additional MX record with lower priority (.i.e. higher number), pointing to that backup mail? I did this assuming that it would cater...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
13 Nov 2005, 05:20 PM
|
Replies: 44
Views: 7,182
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
11 Nov 2005, 06:54 PM
|
Replies: 55
Views: 9,357
Not acceptable
Even if it would seem that "messagingengine.com" is still operational and can forward mail to backup destinations/handlers as previously configured (with a delay though), this is not at all...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
7 Oct 2004, 04:34 PM
|
Replies: 33
Views: 2,737
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
6 Oct 2004, 05:06 AM
|
Replies: 27
Views: 4,417
Re: wait up
You are right, of course. It is the same for me. Actually, looking at the raw mail, the "Sender:" header reflects the correct sender, whereas the "From:" header just contains my plaintext name, like...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
6 Oct 2004, 04:33 AM
|
Replies: 27
Views: 4,417
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
6 Oct 2004, 02:38 AM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 550
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
5 Oct 2004, 04:04 PM
|
Replies: 2
Views: 672
I tried this and sent a mail to myself from...
I tried this and sent a mail to myself from FastMail to FastMail. The received text message was:
And the HTML part was:
I also sent myself a HTML message from another source. The received...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
4 Oct 2004, 09:42 PM
|
Replies: 35
Views: 4,150
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
4 Oct 2004, 09:38 PM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 1,820
I use FM as primary. This does not mean that FM...
I use FM as primary. This does not mean that FM (presently) hosts my MX records, but all email from my (several :-)) domains are forwarded to FastMail which is the place of mail storage. I'm quite...
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
4 Oct 2004, 09:26 PM
|
Replies: 2
Views: 568
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
4 Oct 2004, 04:49 PM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 898
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
3 Oct 2004, 03:36 AM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 711
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
3 Oct 2004, 03:21 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,195
Well, I'm almost 50 - and a southpaw at that,...
Well, I'm almost 50 - and a southpaw at that, which is perhaps why I would prefer the login to the left. OTOH, using FastCheck is far more convenient and efficient than logging in the "standard" way.
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
3 Oct 2004, 03:18 AM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 742
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
3 Oct 2004, 01:12 AM
|
Replies: 33
Views: 2,737
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
3 Oct 2004, 01:02 AM
|
Replies: 18
Views: 1,483
|
Forum: FastMail Forum
2 Oct 2004, 07:46 PM
|
Replies: 36
Views: 2,798
|