Quote:
Originally Posted by DrStrabismus
But you're comparing a situation where having a large number of top-level objects became unworkable with one where it's a non-issue in order to imply that the latter may be absurd. This makes your analogy completely spurious.
|
OK, whatever. The analogy was in parentheses because it wasn't essential to my point. I had asked whether you think having a TLD for every IP would be absurd. You didn't answer, but since you refer to this scenario as a "non-issue" (and, since you keep attacking my points), then it seems that your answer is "no" (which is fine with me... no hard feelings).
Quote:
|
I'd say that your position now boils down to: if the increase in the number of TLD were managed in an absurd way, then the increase might be absurd.
|
My position is exactly as I stated, no decoding is needed. I'd say that your position (since you keep avoiding stating one) now boils down to: you are certain that TLDs will never be managed in an absurd way, period.
It's fine with me if that's your position (and as I said before, I hope you're right). No need to be shy about stating it!
Just sayin'....