View Single Post
Old 27 Apr 2019, 10:12 PM   #33
paleolith
Cornerstone of the Community
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by snappy View Post
I think FM should ditch VADESPAM.
Based on my experience (see posts above), I think changing its score to +2 would make it useful without being overwhelming.

I see no evidence that it shouldn't be added to the bag of tools. The problem is that with a score of +5, FM is basically saying that a positive hit is absolutely always correct.

Quote:
Using this thread as a reference it doesn't seem to benefit its users.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

We don't know how many users FM has, but it's plainly obvious that far under 1% ever post here -- probably far under 1% of 1%. Happy users aren't talking about VADESPAM. This thread is extremely lopsided for the combination of these reasons.

Edward
paleolith is offline   Reply With Quote