EmailDiscussions.com - View Single Post

kpav · 2 Apr 2005, 04:19 AM

Caverrn:

The emails originated from seven different sources, all of which are from different servers; so it does not appear to be a problem on the senders' end at either their computer or their email service. The only common link appears to have been their journey through the runbox server.

One of the emails had the following in the header:

"7Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on oscar.runbox.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_XBL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: **** "

Others did not have the word "spam" at all.

The header on the "spam" portion included:

From xxxxxxx@compusenior.com Fri Apr 01 07:37:25 2005
Return-path: <xxxxxxx@compusenior.com>
Received: from exim by fetch.runbox.com with spamfilter (Exim 4.34)
id 1DHEqS-00055E-Pf
for **********@runbox.com; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:37:24 +0200
Received: from [220.175.156.174] (helo=compusenior.com)
by fetch.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DHEqF-0004pd-AL; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:37:19 +0200
Message-ID: <F5877801.DB32005@compusenior.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:32:20 -0500
From: "corcoran" <xxxxxxx@compusenior.com>
User-Agent: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Columbus Visnic" <xxxxxx@runbox.com>
Subject: Healthier lifestyle -- better alternative
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on oscar.runbox.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,URIBL_SBL autolearn=disabled
version=3.0.1
X-Spam-Level: ***

(Note: I blocked my email address with *** in the above text)

One of the senders has since send another message which was not hijacked as it passed through the runbox server.

Thanks for continuing to think about this strange occurance.

2 Apr 2005, 04:19 AM	#9
kpav Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 9	Caverrn: The emails originated from seven different sources, all of which are from different servers; so it does not appear to be a problem on the senders' end at either their computer or their email service. The only common link appears to have been their journey through the runbox server. One of the emails had the following in the header: "7Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on oscar.runbox.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_XBL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: ** " Others did not have the word "spam" at all. The header on the "spam" portion included: From xxxxxxx@compusenior.com Fri Apr 01 07:37:25 2005 Return-path: <xxxxxxx@compusenior.com> Received: from exim by fetch.runbox.com with spamfilter (Exim 4.34) id 1DHEqS-00055E-Pf for ******@runbox.com; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:37:24 +0200 Received: from [220.175.156.174] (helo=compusenior.com) by fetch.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHEqF-0004pd-AL; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:37:19 +0200 Message-ID: <F5877801.DB32005@compusenior.com> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:32:20 -0500 From: "corcoran" <xxxxxxx@compusenior.com> User-Agent: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Columbus Visnic" <xxxxxx@runbox.com> Subject: Healthier lifestyle -- better alternative Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on oscar.runbox.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,URIBL_SBL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * (Note: I blocked my email address with *** in the above text) One of the senders has since send another message which was not hijacked as it passed through the runbox server. Thanks for continuing to think about this strange occurance. Last edited by Sherry : 2 Apr 2005 at 04:38 PM.