Quote:
Originally Posted by snappy
I think FM should ditch VADESPAM.
|
Based on my experience (see posts above), I think changing its score to +2 would make it useful without being overwhelming.
I see no evidence that it shouldn't be added to the bag of tools. The problem is that with a score of +5, FM is basically saying that a positive hit is absolutely always correct.
Quote:
Using this thread as a reference it doesn't seem to benefit its users.
|
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
We don't know how many users FM has, but it's plainly obvious that far under 1% ever post here -- probably far under 1% of 1%. Happy users aren't talking about VADESPAM. This thread is extremely lopsided for the combination of these reasons.
Edward