|
The Technical Zone... The Geeky forum... Use this forum to discuss technical aspects of email, from authentication protocols to encryption. |
|
Thread Tools |
9 Sep 2018, 05:00 AM | #1 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
|
Spam but not
Could anyone peruse these headers and maybe throw some light on why they would only warrant a -4 score please?
Many thanks Code:
Return-Path: <N.White-richard=c****s.com@ll**dsbankbacs.com> Received: from ll**dsbankbacs.com (196.154.21.46.static.swif*way.net [46.21.154.196]) by galaxy.thinking*ish.com with SMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:12:49 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=key; d=ll**dsbankbacs.com; h=Mime-Version:To:Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Message-ID; bh=EOJ5sdf+KNjA9YuR7BpjEu08bL8=; b=1rev6uEyjTY4D9YTapVj3GqLrclpeYN0rcp8o0zMir9KXp5ei9RCAbeKEKtkgI+t4VEGK5I5LEJm 3QZcurXmVHCOEw7j3an7ZvZwYDCxyhecsjOUPcyfGWenymO+Z9NcAM/ld1Y2311u6MHO6ZWSgO2P KmrII/sahsacXTIji/Q= Received: by ll**dsbankbacs.com id hgvfqqmdero7 for <richard@c****s.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:04:28 -0400 (envelope-from <N.White-richard=c****s.com@ll**dsbankbacs.com>) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: richard@c****s.com Subject: Please find attached your incoming BACs documents. From: "Natalie White" <N.White@ll**dsbankbacs.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:04:28 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=a5e0da94bfbcecccf46ee212d82b4e45 Message-ID: <0.0.3.1.1D440599A072D6C.A525793@ll**dsbankbacs.com> X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_Pass, Reverse DNS Lookup [Passed], ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_Pass X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: -4 |
10 Sep 2018, 07:02 PM | #2 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,945
|
The score depends not only on the headers, but also on the body.
Besides, the "penalty points" are configurable, and the email provider could have done anything (sensible of otherwise) to tweak them.. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|