|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
22 Feb 2002, 02:24 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 18
|
email message previews
A question and an idea:
As reading an email uses bandwidth, do previews use bandwidth? I have the previews option on for all folders. It shows the first three lines, and I've found that sometimes is enough so that I don't have to open the email. Even for replying, if I don't have to respond point by point, just clicking on the address to send the message, instead of opening the email and hitting reply, could save bandwidth. Unless the previews use bandwidth. Also, yesterday, two previews showed 6 lines of the email instead of three. ??? |
22 Feb 2002, 02:27 PM | #2 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
A meaningful amount of bandwidth is only used by downloading attachments. Each character is one "byte". Guests have forty million bytes per month. If each preview line is 40 characters on average, that's a million previews!
Anyway, you can turn them off in the Folders screen if you like. |
22 Feb 2002, 02:33 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 18
|
Thanks, Jeremy, for the reply. :-)
I wasn't worried about reaching my limit, just thinking that using previews could save bandwidth in general. So previews does use bandwidth, then? If I look at another folder and then go back to the inbox, is it using up bandwidth again each time I look? |
22 Feb 2002, 02:39 PM | #4 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
It's using up our bandwidth to send it to you (a tiny amount, at least) but it's not being counted against your account.
|
22 Feb 2002, 02:47 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 18
|
Now I feel guilty. ;-) Here I was trying to help fastmail....
Well, I'm sure I'll never reach my limit or use too much. I've only used 13.7 this month out of 250! |
23 Feb 2002, 03:56 AM | #6 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,274
|
I only used 3.2, so, pretty much of them were wasted...
|
23 Feb 2002, 05:25 AM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 18
|
I don't look at it as being wasted. I look at my allotment as insurance that I can relax and not worry about the emails I'm sending or receiving.
I want to support fastmail, which is why I signed up for Full/5 years. The more bandwidth I can save them, the happier I am. :-) |