|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
4 Dec 2009, 12:35 AM | #16 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 289
|
Yeh, while I'm always tempted to contact the company involved, there are endless news reports of how many PCs are infected with virus' that harvest email adresses etc. I'd think it likely that many companies have no idea they're leaking customer adresses out to spammers.
Subdomain addressing is an invaluable anti spam measure. Just shocked a company would take such a massively ill-informed knee jerk reaction like this. Ahh well, couldn't join a watch company's official forum on timetechtalk, so went & joined that company's page on Facebook instead. No issues with subdomain .fm addresses or militant admin staff there. Last edited by Abydos : 4 Dec 2009 at 05:45 AM. |
4 Dec 2009, 02:10 AM | #17 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,937
|
Quote:
If only I was dishonest, I'd probably have gotten a million employee discounts by now. |
|
4 Dec 2009, 06:43 AM | #18 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 377
|
Same problem here. Many, many forums where I have tried to register refuse to accept any email addresses "from that domain". Some allow it if I use one of FM's other domain names but a few bounce my attempts with every one of FM's other domains. Has something to do with FM's free account history. These forums usually refuse any addresses from "free email services", suspecting that spammers often or always use the free services to send their spam from. Probably was true at one time but now the spammers seem to be able to spoof any domain they want.
This does make using FM more difficult than other services IMO. Jim |
4 Dec 2009, 07:51 AM | #19 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 378
|
You should have said something like this: "Of course I work here too! All morons like you and I work at company ABC
|
4 Dec 2009, 08:01 AM | #20 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a virtually impossible but finitely improbable position
Posts: 2,320
|
Are you serious? It seems like half the world now uses Hotmail or Gmail... I cannot imagine a forum rejecting those free services....
|
4 Dec 2009, 11:53 AM | #21 | |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 377
|
Quote:
All I can say is that at some time in the past Fastmail must have gotten a rep for a lot of spam coming from their addresses. Or possibly when forums stopped accepting free addresses Fastmail had enough of them out there that they got lumped in with the others. Either way it's one of those things that apparently sticks with them for a long time. Jim |
|
4 Dec 2009, 12:19 PM | #22 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
Quote:
|
|
4 Dec 2009, 02:35 PM | #23 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a virtually impossible but finitely improbable position
Posts: 2,320
|
Quote:
My gut says that pretty much any service is going to have similar issues. My gut also says that this is probably not true because I have had almost no problems in all my years at fastmail. I have several businesses, and all my personal mail going through fastmail. The only problem I have ever had is when I tried to send mail through my asian isp - and my emails were immediately labeled SPAM to all my recipients. I get better luck going through fastmail and a vpn than I do going through gmail and a local asian isp... Fastmail would have been on all the spam lists long ago - but from everything I know Fastmail has been quick to make sure that they stay off of spam lists. just my thoughts |
|
4 Dec 2009, 02:43 PM | #24 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,281
|
I've had a couple of instances where my Fastmail messages were rejected by the recipient server because Fastmail's IP was blacklisted -- but not for a long time. For one of those experiences, Fastmail support worked with the receiving service to remove Fastmail from the blacklist. It took a couple of days.
|
4 Dec 2009, 03:15 PM | #25 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
Quote:
If you are in a position however, where your smtp requirements are less, and when you send mail to folk who have addresses at one of the 'big three' and your mail is often directed to bulk mail folders, or (worse) bounced, you have to wonder if a Fastmail account is still the best way to go. Sure... my mail accounts that come with my webhost and ISP are more restrictive than a Fastmail account (and are not as full featured) but my messages to folk who host with the big three almost never get bounced or end up in a spam folder. |
|
4 Dec 2009, 04:19 PM | #26 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a virtually impossible but finitely improbable position
Posts: 2,320
|
Ok, well that is a lot of messages. Many more than I usually send, but I occassionally send out emails to 500 of my closest friends.
Anyhoo, this is only the second time in 5 years that I have heard anything like this. Another time was when fastmail got bumped onto a spam list. But they cleared it up fast. True "Spammers" selling male enhancement and other stuff would probably find the 1000 messages too restrictive. Sending out e-zines, etc. is just becoming standard practice. At what point an ezine becomes spam is probably in the eye of the beholder... |
4 Dec 2009, 07:33 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 70
|
|
6 Dec 2009, 01:42 AM | #28 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 289
|
Yeah, I felt like a loser when I read that too.
|
6 Dec 2009, 05:40 AM | #29 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 378
|
|
7 Dec 2009, 11:04 AM | #30 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a virtually impossible but finitely improbable position
Posts: 2,320
|
|