|
The Off-Topic Lounge APPROPRIATE FAMILY-FRIENDLY TOPICS ONLY - READ THE RULES! This forum is for posting anything (excluding topics prohibited by the forum rules) that's unrelated to email. General discussions, in other words. |
|
Thread Tools |
1 May 2012, 01:21 AM | #3016 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,926
|
ALAS, my body is slowly changing but very little of the modifications are under my control.
|
1 May 2012, 04:15 AM | #3017 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 369
|
Elsewhere in EMD there is a discussion about whether/how to specify in one's LAST will and testament what should be done with one's on-line assets.
Last edited by bramhall : 1 May 2012 at 04:27 AM. |
1 May 2012, 08:45 AM | #3018 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
One would hope that our online assets would never be lost.
|
1 May 2012, 09:11 AM | #3019 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,926
|
Ah, but would you wish that your estate keep or LOSE your online liabilities? Would you like someone to get your detailed browsing history, forum posts, emails, and VOIP phone call contents?
|
3 May 2012, 12:14 AM | #3020 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
You pose some educated questions n5bb
|
3 May 2012, 05:25 AM | #3021 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
Here is a little POEM on the main subject of this illustrious forum:
Why your email should rhyme (from time to time) |
3 May 2012, 11:13 PM | #3022 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,926
|
We should reject POMO (postmodern) essays in this forum, especially computer-generated drivel. For some additional comic relief, visit the DADA-generated automated crackpot generator, which produces spam-like fictions. Be sure to reload your browser several times!
|
4 May 2012, 02:30 AM | #3023 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
In the words of a poor wayfarer.
|
4 May 2012, 10:28 AM | #3024 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,926
|
If your good wine or beer is running low and two are sharing, it's way fairer for one person to POUR it into the glasses and the other to pick their glass.
|
4 May 2012, 08:51 PM | #3025 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
As far as I know there is no similar method to share something equally among FOUR people (there is for three).
Last edited by janusz : 5 May 2012 at 12:21 AM. Reason: silly typo |
5 May 2012, 12:18 AM | #3026 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
Now is the hour of our discontent. We have more than four sharing only one bottle.
|
5 May 2012, 12:36 PM | #3027 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,926
|
YOUR problem was solved in 1995 (Brams-Taylor procedure). This is an algorithm to equitably divide a resource among any number of participants (and it's patented).
|
5 May 2012, 01:40 PM | #3028 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
My prior area of concern was to do with the fact, that if you pour out a bottle of wine (to four or more people) you do not get very much wine (period)
|
6 May 2012, 03:34 AM | #3029 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
I will not POUT though the word "pour" was used twice in quick succession on this page (influence of too much - not too little - wine?)
|
6 May 2012, 03:51 AM | #3030 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
My apologies janusz! Yes, I will try to lay off the port.
Last edited by David : 6 May 2012 at 09:06 AM. Reason: missed an f in off:) |