|
Early Warning... If an email service has closed down or changed the services it offers, or if there are indications it is about to do so, post about it here. |
|
Thread Tools |
21 Mar 2014, 08:13 PM | #31 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hiding under my bed
Posts: 1,465
|
In case anyone is interested: in Namecheap's recent email/newsletter they say
Quote:
|
|
21 Mar 2014, 08:23 PM | #32 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ~$
Posts: 652
|
.mail would have been better. Then we could have domains like fast.mail, tuff.mail, g.mail, hot.mail, and polaris.mail...
Anyway, I only skimmed the previous discussion in this thread but does anyone know what would happen if a company that sponsored a TLD went out of business? It is inevitable that at least some, if not many, of the new TLDs will become rather unprofitable after a while. But if the sponsor goes bankrupt, and nobody else wants to pick up the unprofitable TLD, what happens to all the people who built their online identities and even entire businesses on that TLD? Will all the domains simply disappear, or is there a plan for ICANN to "bail out" failed TLDs? |
21 Mar 2014, 09:08 PM | #33 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 2,616
|
|
21 Mar 2014, 10:31 PM | #34 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,944
|
|
21 Mar 2014, 10:47 PM | #35 | |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ~$
Posts: 652
|
Quote:
But many recently added TLDs like .aero and .xxx have corporate sponsors, and I assume it's the same for all the other new ones. After all, it costs $185,000 to apply for a TLD, so it's off limits to most people http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsored_top-level_domain |
|
22 Mar 2014, 06:14 AM | #37 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Quote:
On a serious note: some ccTLDs have seen their registry become disfunctional before, in which case ICANN usually re-delegates the ccTLD to a new registry (as happened with for example .so, which is operative again after having been down for quite a while). In the worst case scenario, some ccTLDs got defunct as no new registry was assigned, becoming de facto dormant, such as .um I would assume with new TLDs, similar things happen if one of the sponsored TLDs would cease operations. But in the end, your question is interesting and I think nobody knows the ultimate answer as yet. I would say a company better not rely solely on one of those new TLDs for now, because that would be quite a risk indeed. Last edited by Tsunami : 22 Mar 2014 at 06:21 AM. |
|
22 Mar 2014, 01:49 PM | #38 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,281
|
|