|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
28 Nov 2002, 10:03 PM | #1 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 358
|
Mis-delivered mail shows fastmail out of control
In a chilling indication of how fastmail is spiraling out of control,
my mailbox this morning contained 6 emails that were addressed to other people who have domains hosted at Fastmail. (I checked the MX records for all 3 domains.) The person addressed at each domain happens to be my fastmail username. I assume that fastmail cannot find these domains and the mail defaults to the fastmail user with that name (insane). So if you use any of the following domains: mackraz.com trickbit.to brooker.us You need to check with Fastmail immediately to straighten this out. I guess what most disturbs me is that if the system cannot find joeblow@whateverdomain.com it throws the mail into joeblow@fastmail.fm 's mailbox. Last edited by biffbulkie : 28 Nov 2002 at 10:11 PM. |
28 Nov 2002, 10:20 PM | #2 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 529
|
If this is true, this is indeed worrying...I hope Jeremy can clarify this matter soon...
|
28 Nov 2002, 10:29 PM | #3 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
Re: Mis-delivered mail shows fastmail out of control
Quote:
The misconfiguration occured because a user entered a virtual domain address, but no target address. We failed to check for this possibility in our web application. The lack of a target address caused a number of virtual domains to become corrupted for a few hours today. We are currently attempting to contact those people with domains impacted by this problem. The failure to check for empty targets has actually been in the web app the whole time--it's just that today was the first time that a user entered an address without a target, thus triggering the problem. |
|
28 Nov 2002, 10:32 PM | #4 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 358
|
Apparently this has been corrected. The reply from Fastmail indicated that the virtual domain file had been corrupted causing some own domain addresses to not resolve correctly.
I am still angry, as I think this is a Cardinal Sin in the email business. I don't ask for much, but I do INSISIT that email end up only in the inbox it was intended. I wonder how much of my own domain mail might be scattered out there in Fastmail land, in stranger's email boxes? |
28 Nov 2002, 10:33 PM | #5 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 529
|
when it rains, it pours...personally, I find this problem more disturbing than any of the outages we've experienced this past few days...anyways, I hope all such bugs can be anticipated and eliminated totally!
|
28 Nov 2002, 10:35 PM | #6 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
|
|
28 Nov 2002, 10:36 PM | #7 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,118
|
Looking at it from the glass-half-full perspective, the total elapsed time between a significant bug being reported on this Forum and a patch being put in place was 29 minutes (and at midnight local time for the core Fastmail team!)
It would probably take that long just to find somebody (anybody) to contact at most faceless companies... who would then need to escalate the issue, organize a bug fixing meeting (and perhaps a budget meeting), etc. etc. |
28 Nov 2002, 10:41 PM | #8 | |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
For instance, in this particular section of the code, which checks for the validity of new alias records, we have around two dozen separate tests to try to check for every possible potential problem. However, even that wasn't enough in this case to avoid the bug--we had a section that checked for the validity of the target address, which unfortunately treated an empty address as "valid". |
|
28 Nov 2002, 10:51 PM | #9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brasov, Romania
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
Petru |
|
28 Nov 2002, 11:00 PM | #10 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
|
Petru, you'll find that those explanations are already sitting in your email inbox.
|
28 Nov 2002, 11:32 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 107
|
Shakes his head in amazement...
Quote:
Obviously, unless we all want to pay Jeremy/Rob NASA/Military style costs for the first option, you're going to have to accept the 2nd. Being in software development myself, Jeremy/Rob could probably build a system, and test it thoroughly enough to ensure that it won't break. But by this time they would have maybe finished a simple mail backend, and wouldn't have started the interface yet! All of us would love bug-free software, but we all want to get it for $39.95 a year. You're dreaming if you think that's even feasible. Just my $0.02 rant for the day Dip |
|
28 Nov 2002, 11:36 PM | #12 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 529
|
Heh, I know the enormity of the task...I am just particularly concerned about bugs where the privacy of a user is compromised...
|
29 Nov 2002, 12:40 AM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brasov, Romania
Posts: 25
|
Everything working now
Ok, everything seems to be working again now. The lost mail won't come back, but hey, it's just mail
Sorry everyone (especially Jeremy) for my earlier tone and thanks for working on this. Petru |
29 Nov 2002, 12:50 AM | #14 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 211
|
Realizing that no system is bug free, I am very happy with the level of service we get from the FastMail team. I suppose this is easy for me to say since I have experienced any major problems (that I'm aware of) in recent days. Good work, guys!
|
30 Nov 2002, 02:29 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: India
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
|
|