|
Email Comments, Questions and Miscellaneous Share your opinion of the email service you're using. Post general email questions and discussions that don't fit elsewhere. |
|
Thread Tools |
11 Apr 2002, 08:48 AM | #1 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 968
|
Lop2.com
I am really content with my email service right now, but a friend of mine showed me lop2.com and its pretty impressive, so I thought I should share it here. They offer addresses at lob.com and toliet.com. They have a really impressive interface though, so if anyone is looking for a cool service this is really nice. I don't know about reliability or anything though. Tell me what you think!
- esTester |
11 Apr 2002, 02:10 PM | #2 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,347
Representative of:
Runbox.com |
Just for your information...Lop2.com's interface is not their own, but actually a webmail software system bought from AtMail.nl . I think they also have a webaddress at webbasedemail.com.
Inbox.net used to use AtMail's more simple design before they relaunched. AtMail has always had attrative looking interfaces, but functionality-wise it still falters a bit when compared to RunBox and FastMail. Still, overall, for all those solid features and a nice interface with 5 MB included, Lop2 (with the lop.com domain) is a nice FREE account for the user who doesn't need a lot of power, Trip |
11 Apr 2002, 02:31 PM | #3 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 968
|
I had basically the same view on it as you. My friend loves it because he doesn't use email that much and this suits him great. I don't know what I would do without my Fastmail and Domain though . It does have a nice interface like you said and it is different than almost anything I have seen. They did a great job trying to bring Outlook Express to the web (thats how I interpretted it). Anyways if any users need a email provider that is pretty good, but not as rich in features as Fastmail.fm and Runbox, then this looks like it could be for you.
- esTester |
12 Apr 2002, 03:12 AM | #4 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 531
|
i'll add this to my list, and do the test =P see how reliable it is =)
|