|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
31 Oct 2012, 05:41 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 36
|
What's missing from new interface
Problem is that we don't realise what we had until it's gone and a lot seems to have disappeared with the new "improved" interface.
Here's a list of stuff that I made a lot of use of that appears to have gone missing. Please add to the list with what you can't find. INBOX
MESSAGE
COMPOSE
and I haven't even started looking at Adresses, cofigurations etc |
31 Oct 2012, 05:45 AM | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kingaroy, AU
Posts: 3,177
|
Excellent post Quilleron.
|
31 Oct 2012, 05:46 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
|
PLEASE bring back the old interface
I too hate the new interface.
I used the "copy" feature frequently. It's gone. In settings, under "Conversations," the setting "Show every message separately doesn't work. |
31 Oct 2012, 11:45 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 78
Representative of:
Fastmail.fm |
Perhaps I can help you find alternatives to some of these to help you get by in the new interface.
You can search for attachments by typing "HASATT" in the search box. This is not a new feature. Similarly, you can search by 'from:' and 'to:' See https://www.fastmail.fm/help/mailbox_searching.html Several of the message actions you are looking for are under "More" on the message read screen. There's also several new shortcut keys, including one for delete permanently. Here's how the delete shortcuts work: '#' => Context-sensitive delete (i.e. permanently if and only if in Trash or Spam or Contacts). 'd' => Move to trash (wherever valid). '%' => Delete permanently (from any mailbox screen). |
31 Oct 2012, 12:31 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
|
To me the biggest problem with the new interface is the complete lack of documentation for it coupled with the fact that intuitive commands in the old interface have been replaced with utterly undocumented key combinations and other similarly arcane steps.
Attach from file storage is a good example. It's probably still present (because that's the whole point of file storage and the reason the per file size limit in file storage is the same as the attachment size limit) but I have no clue how to do it. Clicking and dragging from file storage doesn't seem to do the trick (although I wouldn't particularly like doing this anyway.) I think, at the very least, this rollout should have been put off until you had time to at least write a couple of text files telling us how to do everything in the new interface. |
31 Oct 2012, 12:41 PM | #6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 78
Representative of:
Fastmail.fm |
Quote:
In most cases, keyboard shortcuts are discoverable by mousing over the associated button. There are a few cases where this is not so (such as searching for a folder name, deleting permanently in some cases, and auto-formatting plain text). Quote:
|
||
31 Oct 2012, 12:48 PM | #7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA Northwest
Posts: 3,849
|
Just a quick tally here
Quilleron lists 33 items
marianh remedies about 5 of them At that rate I remain unimpressed with this beta-released-too-early. Poor marianh, having to wade into this messy release. I hope it's a job you're paid for. Is there something inherently dumb about exploring with your mouse to find a keyboard shortcut??! We used to hit a keyboard stroke to expose that list! That was in the OLD OLD interface, two before the CLASSIC one. |
31 Oct 2012, 01:02 PM | #8 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kingaroy, AU
Posts: 3,177
|
|
31 Oct 2012, 01:16 PM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 78
Representative of:
Fastmail.fm |
Quote:
Having said that though, there are definitely areas where feedback will be taken in to account, which is one of the reasons I'm here, and taking note of each and every person's responses. We realise that the current state of the new interface will not fit each and every use case for each and every user. Thus I will do my best to help you find your way around it, and take note of what you miss the most if it is indeed missing, so we can be sure to have it move up our priority list. There will inevitably be differences between the classic and new interfaces - what we are trying to ascertain is what you most need that is missing, not just a list of differences. Regarding wading through the feedback - my job is QA (quality assurance), and I do work for Fastmail. So I'm not just doing this in my spare time Having said that, my top priority in being here right now is to help. No one is demanding myself or my colleagues to be present here in EMD, that's our choice. |
|
31 Oct 2012, 01:36 PM | #10 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kingaroy, AU
Posts: 3,177
|
Thanks Marian, for taking the time and trouble to initiate action on Fastmail users' issues with the alternative new interface.
(Aha QA heh; then Opera would have a procedure for change management of a product including a communication plan component - just saying ;-)) |
31 Oct 2012, 01:56 PM | #11 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA Northwest
Posts: 3,849
|
Quote:
It's all I can tolerate now to use the Classic interface, most the time I will use my phone or Windows Live Mail. By the way, using FM on a smart phone browser used to be fairly decent. The Classic interface wrecked that. Now there's no OLD interface so I am stuck using Android mail, which is bad bad. |
|
31 Oct 2012, 03:49 PM | #13 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 1,238
|
I'm using K9 mail, and have been doing so, on two different devices, for a long time.
Since the change on 30th October, it doesn't work as well as it used to. All folders (60+) were "push", but now the majority have lost their settings & are being polled. I am going to have to reinstall - a task I'm putting off at present. Edited to add:- Worked for a while on setings, and all appears to be back to normal. I believe the problems were related to the changes to FM on 30th but can't prove it. All's well that ends well. NJSS Last edited by NJSS : 1 Nov 2012 at 12:46 AM. Reason: Update |
31 Oct 2012, 04:36 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 78
|
Thank you Quilleron. In my correspondence with Johan Borg and Lars Boilesen I have be imploring Opera to issue an official list of everything that has been omitted from the new interface.
Thus far I have had no response on this issue. As I have said in various previous posts having a classic interface is really neither here nor there. I should think that most of us here are pretty clued in and know full well that classic means unsupported and means will be dropped at some time in the future when all those annoying users give up and go away. So for me the absolutely essential goal of the current forum discussion is to get a statement form Opera detailing the reasons why these key features that made FM what FM was have been dropped and what plan exists, if any, to restore these features to the new interface. If we can illicit a little honesty from Opera and establish, as I think from various posts herein are hinting at, that there is no intention to restore these features and that there is a hidden agenda here. Then great we know where we stand and either decide to stick with the inferior service. Or attempt to find something else. There is quite obviously huge wealth of talent in these forums. I am quite sure that if a few bright people got together we could have a feature rich sensible and fast e mail system up and running in a month or so with all the features we know and love and which make perfect common sense. A wise person once said to me, after I had rather spectacularly messed up, "that's what you call experience and there is nothing in this world more expensive than experience". Well if Opera want to chuck away the vast wealth of experience represented by the finely tuned features of fastmail that have evolved with the system over the past decade or so then more fool them. And what a great opportunity for some one else. |
31 Oct 2012, 05:17 PM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
Hi Marianh, there's a thread that I'm trying to consolidate all issues in and it includes missing features from this thread too: http://www.emaildiscussions.com/showthread.php?t=65511 I find it really weird to remind us that you don't 'have' to be on EMD and that it's a personal choice you are doing to 'help'. It makes my blood boil even more than the whole fiasco that happened yesterday. |
|