|
Email Comments, Questions and Miscellaneous Share your opinion of the email service you're using. Post general email questions and discussions that don't fit elsewhere. |
|
Thread Tools |
21 Nov 2014, 12:24 AM | #1 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Reliable email service for using in Outlook and webmail
I would like to know which of the free email providers would be recommended for using in Outlook. So far I've only used webmail, so I never really enquired about which service is reliable to be used in Outlook. I would like the service that received messages are downloaded to Outlook and also stored online in webmail, so no POP3 where messages are disappearing from webmail once they appear in the email client.
I am not sure if I should ever delete an email from Outlook, and if that affects the online copy of that email in webmail as well? Preferably a provider which will be around long-term and has proven its reliability, and without inactivity limits for using with email client (or I should know to log in with webmail as well each X months or weeks in case this is required to keep the account alive, even when accessing Outlook very frequently) I know these days even big players such as Gmail, Hotmail/Live/Outlook, etc have an option to be used with an email client. I am not sure which service is recommended though? Purpose is long term usage without any headaches |
21 Nov 2014, 12:32 AM | #2 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,908
|
Outlook.com. Have more 'trust' in Microsoft than Google.
|
21 Nov 2014, 12:47 AM | #3 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Do you need to log in to the webmail as well every X weeks/months to keep the account alive? Or is checking Outlook several times a week or at least once a week sufficent to keep the account alive even when only using it in the email client?
What about the likes of Yahoo (not sure if they have the option for using with an email client?), EUMX, Zoho, ... ?? Or is it most reliable to stick with Microsoft/Live/Outlook? PS: the option where emails are retained in webmail even once they appear in the email client, is called IMAP? Can you add it to Outlook on 2 computers and still have the incoming mails retained in the webmail version once the mail has appeared in the email client on both machines? Sorry for these rookie questions ; haven't used anything but webmail for quite a lot of years ... |
21 Nov 2014, 12:59 AM | #4 |
Ultimate Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada.
Posts: 10,355
|
I would think it better to use a combination of Webmail and IMAP, rather than a combination of Webmail and POP, under the circumstances.
Any email client will do; whichever one you like the best. |
21 Nov 2014, 03:03 AM | #5 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 5,485
|
Although I could probably answer the local client questions, since I also haven't used same for many years now myself, I might prefer to defer to someone who has used such a client more recently.
However, as for "inactivity limits", the last I remember, Microsoft advertised keeping accounts "alive" with a login at least every 9 months (or 270 days?), and I believe Gmail was the same. Since I'm not sure whether login with a client would count toward that limit, I might prefer to login through the web at least that often to try to make sure. As for, e.g., Yahoo, offhand I'm not sure what its limit is, but I'm sort of half-guessing that it may be about the same. Although I mainly use Gmail myself, that may be more out of habit than anything, so I don't really feel inclined to recommend "a" service, except to say that Yahoo is probably the last one which I would personally trust of the "big three". |
21 Nov 2014, 11:12 PM | #6 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Quote:
Since the email address would be for more professional purposes than the one I was using already, outlook.com or gmail.com would be more suitable domains than 'yahoo' IMO, although probably the fame of Yahoo would make anyone accept that one easily too ... But outlook.com for example sounds a lot nicer. I was wondering whether to stick with one of the "big three" for long-duration and reliability purposes, or whether to also consider EUMX, Zoho, Mail.be, ... ? |
|
21 Nov 2014, 11:16 PM | #7 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Quote:
I would say the same about Yahoo, not sure why but each time I see a friend using it it comes across as quite slow. Haven't seen the new interface yet, and in theory of course this should not affect the usage of them via an email client. But of the big three I'd be more keen intuitionally to go with Gmail or Outlook.com ... |
|
22 Nov 2014, 12:07 AM | #8 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,281
|
Quote:
There are client setups to retain local copies by taking the messages out of the synchronized folders - moving to local folders, if desired. |
|
22 Nov 2014, 01:01 AM | #9 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Quote:
|
|
22 Nov 2014, 01:19 AM | #10 | |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 5,485
|
Quote:
|
|
22 Nov 2014, 07:37 AM | #11 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 296
|
Outlook can access server mail with IMAP, EAS, and EWS (exchange server). All free email providers to IMAP, but only Outlook.com does EAS.
The advantage of EAS over IMAP is everything syncs: all folders, contacts, calendar and tasks. If you set up an EAS (exchange) account on a smartphone, you will see changes you make in on one platform appear in the other one instantly. Same goes for webmail. Outlook 2013 will automatically configure outlook/hotmail accounts as EAS. You also get categories. Outook has an option to only store the last X months of email on the PC, so you can archive everything instead of deleting. |
22 Nov 2014, 08:16 AM | #12 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,281
|
Quote:
|
|
22 Nov 2014, 09:30 PM | #13 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
That is the issue - I would "clean up" Outlook often, but would prefer that even when deleting a message from the mail client, the webmail version retains that email. But it seems that then POP3 with a message to never delete from the server could be an option? Or to archive messages?(although I have no experience with archiving options so never tried this before)
|
2 Dec 2014, 10:29 PM | #14 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,341
|
Started using Outlook.com ; so far so good In the webmail version, I only struggle with the address book. As in: whenever trying to add a contact to addresses, the address book opens as a second tab. Which makes me confused if closing that tab and signing out of the inbox at the end of having read and sent mails, is sufficient to have logged off from the entire account?
PS: same can happen the other way round: going from the inbox to address book in the same tab, but when then wanting to return to the outlook.com inbox it opens as a new tab. Of course the above problem is only occuring in the webmail version, not in an email client. |
2 Dec 2014, 11:06 PM | #15 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 5,485
|
Unfortunately, as I said above, never having used the Outlook client, offhand I have no advice for you regarding the "tabs" problem. But I am curious, since you didn't say, how did you end up setting the Outlook account up in the client -- as a POP, IMAP, EAS, or EWS account (the latter two of which I have no personal familiarity at all)?
|