|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
12 Jun 2006, 11:17 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 66
|
Backscatter not working
Hello
since 2pm today we're inundated with backscatter emails which do not get caught by the Spam option. I have set it to sort all backscatter into the junk mail folder, but they simply remain in the Inbox. Any ideas on where I'm going wrong? Norbert |
12 Jun 2006, 11:49 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanstead, England
Posts: 170
|
If you look at the full header of an example incoming backscatter message, does it contain the "X-Backscatter: Yes" tag?
|
12 Jun 2006, 11:52 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
Return-Path: <SMS@xxyyzz.com> Received: from mx4.internal (mx4.internal [10.202.2.203]) by server3.messagingengine.com (Cyrus v2.3.6) with LMTPA; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:01:27 -0400 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 X-Spam-score: 1.6 X-Spam-hits: BAYES_50, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID, NO_REAL_NAME, SUBJECT_EXCESS_BASE64 X-Resolved-to: bsa@fastmail.fm X-Delivered-to: AlanovdHester@aabbcc.org X-Mail-from: SMS@xxyyzz.com Received: from smtp-antispam.venoco_gua.com (mail.venoco.com [200.11.202.58]) by mx4.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 35A7D90390 for <AlanovdHester@aabbcc.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:01:26 -0400 (EDT) From: SMS@xxyyzz.com To: AlanovdHester@aabbcc.org Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:05:16 -0400 Subject: =?utf-8?B?UG9saWN5IFZpb2xhdGlvbm==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <20060612140126.35A7D90390@mx4.messagingengine.com> Text view Print view Hide full header The following message sent by this account has violated system policy: From: AlanovdHester@saabbcc.org To: claguado@xxyyzz.com Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:04:16 -0400 Subject: indiscretion arachnid cartographer? The following violations were detected: |
|
13 Jun 2006, 12:03 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanstead, England
Posts: 170
|
Using your Settings, Spam/Virus Protection, Backscatter action drop-down, set the Action to Nothing then click Save.
Now go in again and set it back to the current option, clicking Save once more. Toggling the switch makes sure your requirement to have the X-Backscatter tag included in the header is acknowledged by the server. If you receive further problem mails which still don't have the tag, then that part of the recently-introduced scanning code has gone off-line for reasons unknown. Alternatively, the messages which are bouncing to you were sent via an FM server or via a server whose hostname appears on your Whitelist. That would also stop the tag being added. Last edited by Mal : 13 Jun 2006 at 12:13 AM. |
13 Jun 2006, 01:00 AM | #5 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,458
|
Perhaps the backscatter feature only works on properly formatted bounce messages. This one doesn't have a null from address. We'll have to see what the staff says, I think. IIRC, they haven't provided any technical details on how the backscatter feature works.
Of course, fastmail is completely down, so it may be a while... |
13 Jun 2006, 01:03 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
Norbert |
|
20 Jun 2006, 11:32 AM | #8 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,102
Representative of:
Fastmail.FM |
Currently we look at the MAIL FROM envelope and match it against this regexp.
$MailFrom !~ /^$|^postmaster\@|^MAILER-DAEMON\@|^root\@|^postoffice\@|^null\@|^autoresponse-bounce\@/i; I'm always expanding the regexp + the code that looks for the "original headers" in the email. You can forward copies of uncaught emails to robm+backscatter@fastmail.fm (use the Attach Orig option in the web interface). I'll look at them. Rob |
20 Jun 2006, 11:34 AM | #9 | |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,102
Representative of:
Fastmail.FM |
Quote:
Ok, it doesn't go into all the nitty gritty details, but it explains the basic principle of what it does. Rob |
|