How long have you been a member? Since when?

ftcnt · 26 Feb 2006, 09:14 AM

Hello everyone, out of curiosity I was wondering when did you join runbox ? thanks.

fidebeque · 28 Feb 2006, 08:28 AM

February 2005

BKB · 28 Feb 2006, 11:01 AM

December 2002.

**ReuvenNY** · 28 Feb 2006, 08:33 PM

Since Sun, 04 Feb 2001 22:51:49 GMT

ALG · 28 Feb 2006, 11:32 PM

Since back when it was a free service.

AL

imants · 1 Mar 2006, 12:11 AM

since January 2001, when it was free

abaco · 1 Mar 2006, 08:30 PM

Sun, 02 Mar 2003

odedp · 4 Mar 2006, 03:07 PM

From Runbox early (and free...) days.

zapata · 4 Mar 2006, 07:09 PM

<sarcasm> Probably too long ... </sarcasm>

A lot of features are poorly implemented; some requested features are not implemented yet; far too many bugs; new imap server announced severaly months ago, but still not ready;

Where else can I get a .no address?
(The only reason why I still use Runbox)

mbz · 5 Mar 2006, 04:26 AM

Since Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:03:31 GMT.

Quote:

Originally posted by zapata

Where else can I get a .no address?
(The only reason why I still use Runbox) [/b]

Just out of pure curiosity, why would you "need" to have a .no address?

You could try epost.no, email.no and home.no.

But I doubt they will meet your needs, they basically are simple webmail / pop accounts, normally overloaded with ads.

carverrn · 5 Mar 2006, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by zapata
<sarcasm> Probably too long ... </sarcasm>

I don't understand you zapata. You seem to constantly put-down Runbox yet you still seem to use it and have even been posting help for some questions. Why do you still use it if you don't like it?

I know you said it's because of the ".no" domain name but if you really want it that bad why not get your own? I guess individuals can't get ".no" domains but from what I've read they can get names off the "priv.no" domain. Refer to this document Domain name Policy for .no.

Quote:

Originally posted by zapata
A lot of features are poorly implemented; some requested features are not implemented yet; far too many bugs; new imap server announced severaly months ago, but still not ready;

There are a few features that have limited functions (e.g. Address Book). But what others do you consider poor?

What "bugs" are you referring to? I think the bugs with the current IMAP server are addressed in the new IMAP server (at least the ones I've tried seem to be). Any besides the IMAP server?

As I understand it, the new IMAP server is being done by a third party. When testing turns up problems Runbox has to wait for the contractor to fix the problem and deliver an updated version. This can be a slow process depending on the nature of the problem. From my simple testing the new IMAP server seems to work fine. I'm sure that once they are comfortable with releasing the new IMAP server they will.

Regards,
Rich

26 Feb 2006, 09:14 AM	#1
ftcnt Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 27	How long have you been a member? Since when? Hello everyone, out of curiosity I was wondering when did you join runbox ? thanks.

28 Feb 2006, 08:28 AM	#2
fidebeque Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lisbon@Portugal Posts: 46	February 2005

28 Feb 2006, 11:01 AM	#3
BKB Cornerstone of the Community Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New York, NY Posts: 900	December 2002.

28 Feb 2006, 08:33 PM	#4
ReuvenNY Moderator Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: New York Posts: 4,259	Since Sun, 04 Feb 2001 22:51:49 GMT

28 Feb 2006, 11:32 PM	#5
ALG Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Murray, KY USA Posts: 162	Since back when it was a free service. AL

1 Mar 2006, 12:11 AM	#6
imants Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 49	since January 2001, when it was free

1 Mar 2006, 08:30 PM	#7
abaco Junior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 19	Sun, 02 Mar 2003

4 Mar 2006, 03:07 PM	#8
odedp Master of the @ Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Tel-Aviv, ISRAEL Posts: 1,665	From Runbox early (and free...) days.

4 Mar 2006, 07:09 PM	#9
zapata Essential Contributor Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Wien, Østerrike Posts: 375	<sarcasm> Probably too long ... </sarcasm> A lot of features are poorly implemented; some requested features are not implemented yet; far too many bugs; new imap server announced severaly months ago, but still not ready; Where else can I get a .no address? (The only reason why I still use Runbox)