|
Email Comments, Questions and Miscellaneous Share your opinion of the email service you're using. Post general email questions and discussions that don't fit elsewhere. |
|
Thread Tools |
12 Apr 2020, 03:33 PM | #1 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,145
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
My requirements for an email provider
Privacy stuff is not a part of my requirements. It's a nice feature to have, but it's not a blocking criterion. From the state mass surveillance perspective, I'm not going to actively implement many of the opsec measures because they are inconvenient. From the advertisement surveillance perspective, 90% of the emails I receive are automated, so there is a marketer on the other side who is probably selling my preferences anyway. If I want to keep something really private, I don't send it through email. I have started looking at many email providers since last year, but not many of them fit the bill. And those that meet all the requirements are at least 50$/year. I signed up for the trial version of several, but none of them stuck. Many providers boast that they are located in country X with strong privacy laws, but that is marketing only. Even Switzerland, which is famous for strong privacy laws, gave additional power to their intelligence agencies so that they could monitor the population more closely. The German intelligence agency, BND, cooperated with NSA: BND would spy on Americans, NSA would spy on Germans and they would exchange intel. So there is not much advantage in hosting your email in a Swiss underground bunker. Some of the more notable email providers:
The first two are very security and privacy oriented. If that's your main concern, go for it. But it comes with some inconveniences: no server side search and you can't use 3rd party apps to read your email, just the apps they provide. They have some workarounds, but they just move the problem onto your machine (they offer a bridge that you install locally and which translates their custom protocol to IMAP and does indexing). Fastmail was my top choice, from a usability perspective and I read many good reviews of it. It ticks all the boxes, at a cost of 50$ per year. I evaluated it a year ago, but because the construction of my house started, I put the email migration project on hold. See full story: https://rolisz.ro/2020/04/11/moving-away-from-gmail/ |
12 Apr 2020, 04:36 PM | #2 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 812
|
Hi,
Yes, Fastmail will be suitable for your requirement. Tutanota Protonmail both are having low storage. Protonmail is good, but for more 10 GB space, you need to go for their visionary plan and it will be costly. So FM is good choice. |
12 Apr 2020, 11:32 PM | #3 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,742
|
Ha! I linked to the same story in another thread about Purelymail. http://www.emaildiscussions.com/showthread.php?t=74426
|
13 Apr 2020, 08:11 AM | #4 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,908
|
Quote:
|
|
13 Apr 2020, 11:38 AM | #5 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,145
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
Quote:
|
|
13 Apr 2020, 03:33 PM | #6 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 2,616
|
But you did post here most of the blog content!
When I started reading the first post, I was thinking why is Jeff asking all this when he's already got his own service and seems quite savvy. It was only when I looked at the posted link I realised he was quoting! Quote:
|
|
13 Apr 2020, 06:47 PM | #7 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,908
|
|
13 Apr 2020, 09:27 PM | #8 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,742
|
My own personal requirements for an email provider start out like this:
1. Security: Big enough to have a long track record of keeping email accounts safe and secure. 2. Reliability: Big enough and old enough to have a long track record of providing reliable service with no loss of email. The really small and obscure providers can offer compelling products at great price points, but without my #1 and #2 above I just can't use them. |
13 Apr 2020, 09:49 PM | #9 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,145
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
Quote:
|
|
13 Apr 2020, 09:59 PM | #10 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,742
|
Quote:
|
|
13 Apr 2020, 10:06 PM | #11 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,145
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
Quote:
But I do use gsuite, including gdrive, online office etc. Use gsuite's gmail very few. Currently my domains are hosting at gsuite and pobox (mailstore), both work just fine. |
|
13 Apr 2020, 10:10 PM | #12 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,742
|
I should add that I consider Fastmail/Pobox to be among the best, and I have used them both in the recent past. I believe they both meet my #1 and #2 requirements. In fact, I had a Fastmail account before I had a Gmail account, and it worked great. Today, however, I need to have everything in the cloud because I am rarely living or working in one place for long. The online office suites offered by Google and Microsoft are critical to me and it is far easier to utilize one ecosystem of products.
|
13 Apr 2020, 11:29 PM | #13 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,742
|
I should add that Apple Mail should be right up there too, and their online office suite is quite usable. I have lots of friends that are all Apple to the point they struggle a bit using mainstream stuff like Gmail and Microsoft Office. A lot of people are totally all-in with Apple. I read the other day that 83% of teens in the USA have an iPhone, and in most business settings it is the defacto phone choice, so Apple Mail is well tested and trusted.
|