|
Runbox Forum Everything related to Runbox should go here: suggestions, comments, complaints, questions, technical issues, etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
7 Sep 2008, 12:27 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 76
|
spam leaking through. question...
I'm seeing a small amount of very obvious SPAM sneaking through to my Inbox.
I have the following filters to help with SPAM: Order: -8 Messages where header contains X-Spam-Level: ****** will be deleted Order: -7 Messages where header contains X-Spam-Level: ***** will be deleted Order: -6 Messages where header contains X-Spam-Level: **** will be deleted Order: -2 Messages where header contains X-Spam-Flag: YES will be saved to folder Trash Here is an example Spam message. I have blanked out my actual email address. The header very obviously shows it as SPAM... yet it still hit my Inbox. Any ideas? Code:
From user2@domain2 Sat Sep 06 12:27:59 2008 Return-path: <user2@domain2> Received: from [10.9.9.160] (helo=penny.runbox.com) by anubis.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kbv1L-0004Nm-7i for xxxxxxxxxxx@runbox.com; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:27:59 +0200 Received: from exim by penny.runbox.com with spamfilter (Exim 4.50) id 1Kbv1I-0006yo-OL for xxxxxxxxxxx@runbox.com; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:27:59 +0200 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on bars.runbox.com X-Spam-Level: ****************************** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=30.4 required=4.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2, HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,NULL_IN_BODY, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK, URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr * 2) * 4.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (Split * IP) * 2.6 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO * 0.0 MIME_BASE64_BLANKS RAW: Extra blank lines in base64 encoding * 2.8 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding * 1.5 NULL_IN_BODY FULL: Message has NUL (ASCII 0) byte in message * 2.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs: iuuuea.com] * 1.6 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist * [URIs: iuuuea.com] * 2.1 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist * [URIs: iuuuea.com] * 2.9 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: iuuuea.com] * 2.1 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist * [URIs: iuuuea.com] * 2.5 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist * [URIs: iuuuea.com] * 1.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address * [213.37.53.155 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS Received: from [213.37.53.155] (helo=213.37.53.155.dyn.user.ono.com) by penny.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kbv0h-0005Wx-Gd; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:27:21 +0200 X-Originating-IP: 96.39.238.82 by smtp.213.37.53.155; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:20:09 +0600 Message-ID: <qfzvtebNWASWlmp@runbox.com> From: "Removed" <user1@runbox.com> Reply-To: "Removed" <user1@runbox.com> To: user1@runbox.com Subject: Summer discount on w4tches Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:27:09 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SWYgeW91J3ZlIHdhaXRlZCB0byBnZXQgeW91ciBUNGcgSDN1ZXIgcmVwbDFjYSB3NHRjaCwN CnRoaXMgaXMgdGhlIHJpZ2h0IHRpbWUgdG8gZ28gZm9yIGl0LCBiZWNhdXNlIA0KUHJlc3Qx Z2UgUmVwbDFjYXMgaXMgb2ZmZXJpbmcgd2hvbGVzYWxlciBwcmljZXMgb24NCmFsbCB0aGVp ciByZXBsMWNhIHc0dGNoZXMgZHVyaW5nIHRoZSBtb250aCBvZiBTZXB0ZW1iZXIuIA0KaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5pdXV1ZWEuY29tLw0K X Last edited by Sherry : 7 Sep 2008 at 03:17 AM. |
7 Sep 2008, 12:46 AM | #2 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,606
Representative of:
Runbox.com |
You also appear to have a filter that says:
Order: -10 Messages where From contains runbox.com will be saved to folder Inbox This example has a "From" address that contains "runbox.com" so it will be moved to the "Inbox" before your spam test filters/rules. Once a message is moved to a folder no further filters/rules are applied. Regards, Rich |
7 Sep 2008, 04:03 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
|
|
7 Sep 2008, 05:22 AM | #4 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,606
Representative of:
Runbox.com |
No problem
|