|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
18 Feb 2005, 02:23 AM | #1 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 706
|
Fastmail blocked or me???
I am trying to send email from my Fastmail account (tried both Thunderbird and webmail) and all messages sent to a certain provider are coming back to me with the message "undelivered mail returned to sender". I can't figure out if it is my IP address that is blocked or Fastmail... still have to learn how to read all that techniccal mambo jambo
This is what is stated in the email: This is the Postfix program at host frontend1.messagingengine.com. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program <xxxxxx@chello.nl>: host smtp.chello.nl[xxxxxx.243.2] said: 551 Mail from your IP is currently blocked based on RBL listing (in reply to RCPT TO command) Reporting-MTA: dns; frontend1.messagingengine.com X-Postfix-Queue-ID: CDC83C5956D X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; me@fastmail.fm Arrival-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:14:20 -0500 (EST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; xxxxx@chello.nl Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host smtp.chello.nl[xxx.46.243.2] said: 551 Mail from your IP is currently blocked based on RBL listing (in reply to RCPT TO command) Hanneke |
18 Feb 2005, 02:28 AM | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,533
|
This same thing happened to me a couple of days ago when trying to respond to an e-mail. I'm still waiting to hear back from FM support.
|
18 Feb 2005, 02:57 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
http://openrbl.org/ip/66/111/4/26.htm |
|
18 Feb 2005, 03:25 AM | #4 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 307
|
Last year we got daily downtime from server crashes. This year we get daily downtime from Spamcop.
Date Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:34 PM From MAILER-DAEMON@unspecified-domain [Add] To <me> Subject Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Show full header This is the Postfix program at host frontend1.messagingengine.com. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program <them>: host their.server[###.###.###.#] said: 591 Your host [66.111.4.26] is blacklisted by bl.spamcop.net. Include copy of this bounce message for help. Send your questions to blacklist-adminATsstar.com (in reply to RCPT TO command) |
18 Feb 2005, 03:43 AM | #5 |
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westwood, MA
Posts: 348
|
SpamCop interferes again
Yes, this is SpamCop interfering again, because, in their words, there have been two reports of spam sent from fastmail in the last 17 days. Specifically, "Listing History:
In the past 16.6 days, it has been listed 2 times for a total of 26 hours". Y'know, if someone like me "bounces" spam back, since the recipient is often someone other than the actual recipient, they'd probably see it as spam. This suggests that bouncing might not be the best way to dispose of junk mail. Maybe delete only should be the policy. Suggestions? |
18 Feb 2005, 04:09 AM | #6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 85
|
Re: SpamCop interferes again
Quote:
(Some good news maybe - it looks like the latest problem has been marked as resolved ?) Code:
-- SPAM SOURCE REPORT -- IP Address Start/Duration Trap User Mole Simp Additional comments 66.111.4.26 Feb 16 11h/1 0 8 0 0 delisted manually, marked resolved 66.111.4.25 Feb 11 17h/3 0 14 0 0 marked resolved Quote:
saves your own bandwidth, and avoids exposing your actual FM account name (if bouncing from an alias) ... (It would be nice to be able to reject at SMTP level, but failing that, post-receipt filtering and deletion is probably the next best thing). |
||
Thread Tools | |
|
|