|
FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
29 Mar 2008, 12:30 PM | #16 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 676
|
|
29 Mar 2008, 12:48 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
|
I think the reason this isn't currently done is because with IMAP you need to create a new copy of the message and delete the old one, rather than modifying the original. I could be wrong, but that's what I remember.
|
30 Mar 2008, 11:02 PM | #18 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,930
|
I believe you are correct, Dan.
And I don't see what all the fuss is about. It is easy to change your spam settings to "custom" and remove the spam marking feature from all received messages. Or you can use the "edit as new" feature in the advanced version of the View screen to edit the subject as needed. Adding your correspondents to your online address book allows address book whitelisting to keep nearly all desired messages away from your Junk Mail folder and eliminates the spam marking. Bill |
31 Mar 2008, 12:12 AM | #19 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,027
|
Because restoring the subject line is "the right thing to do" when marking something as non-spam. It is (what I believe) what people would expect.
For short: usability. Last edited by rabarberski : 31 Mar 2008 at 12:12 AM. Reason: typo |
5 Apr 2008, 08:11 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 79
|
I support this request
I am afraid that N5BB, although making a helpful comment, actually missed the precise meaning of this thread's request.
Indeed, we still want to see the Spam marking in the header of junk mails so as to be able to quickly and "visually" identify the level of "Spamminess" of likely junk mails. However, once a "wrongly labeled junk mail" has been identified as being in reality "non junk", it would be great if the "this is not spam" button would not only (1) enrich the spam detection database and (2) move that mail to the normal intray, but also (3) automatically remove the "Spam" reference from its header. |
8 Apr 2008, 11:38 PM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17
|
Bill: sorry, but but that does not solve the problem: how do you change the subject of an already received, already marked email message? That is what I want, i.e., for cases where the marking didn't work out because the rules identifying the email as spam incorrectly judged nonspam as spam. Reread the suggestion: I think you'll find that's what the request was. Thanks.
|
7 May 2008, 03:59 AM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 15
|
Just want to add my desire to see such a feature ... and like others, agree that marking the message as non-spam should move it to my inbox AND remove that spam label in the subject line.
When displaying a mailbox, it already severly limits the subject characters displayed - that spam label makes it worse. |
23 May 2008, 08:40 PM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5
|
I also agree - report non-spam should do all of the following:
In the case of learning spam folders utilized by imap clients, all of the above should occur as well. It would be nice if the process could run several times per day (once every two or three hours) instead of daily. By moving the email to the inbox it would also eliminate the need to auto purge this folder. |
4 Aug 2008, 11:21 PM | #24 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
I'd suggest that this is a feature that many non-Advanced users would like access to, while still relying on the recommended settings in the other options. Why not bring it up a level to the main screen? After all, if suspected spam is being sent to a Junk folder (and in my client this also means that it's marked in a non-permanent way) for many people there is no need to have an additional (and unchangeable) label applied to the header as well. Incidentally, for any users of FastMail who use Outlook as a client it is in fact possible to edit Subject lines. Open the email in its own window. Select the Subject line text, edit according to your needs (say, by deleting that spam header) and then close the window, saving when prompted. I use this all the time at work for when people send me emails with unhelpful or vague or irrelevant subject lines. (And I'm planning to set up my FastMail acct in Outlook for a day just to edit the marked subject lines in non-spam that's come through in my first days of using it.) |
|
4 Aug 2008, 11:22 PM | #25 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
|
1 Dec 2008, 11:54 PM | #26 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 656
|
|
30 May 2009, 12:51 PM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
|
Has this feature been incorporated into the latest version of fastmail?
If not, I too would find it extremely useful. |
31 May 2009, 04:08 AM | #28 | |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,930
|
How to set up your account to not see any spam markings
Quote:
|
|
1 Jun 2009, 05:51 AM | #29 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
|
Bill, thanks for your suggestion.
I did read this thread in its entirety before posting above. The problem with your approach, if i understand it correctly, is that it takes away the ability to use the spam ratings. I find it helpful to see the spam ratings in the subject lines of messages that the software has judged possible spam. I use the ratings in deciding whether to mark something not-spam. If I were to change the spam screening rules to not show the spam rating in the subject line, I would lose that bit of very useful information. What is sorely needed is the option of having the software screen the message, mark the subject line of possible spam as such with the spam rating (or tag these messages in some other way that is readily recognized without having to open them), then remove the spam header once the user determines that the message is not spam. |
1 Jun 2009, 07:19 AM | #30 |
Intergalactic Postmaster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 8,930
|
I use the spam markings myself. But I have nearly zero false positives (good messages wrongly classified as spam). This is due to:
|