EMD Photo Page - Page 32

FredOnline · 3 Jan 2012, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malc 44

...so will we be seeing your mugshot soon then Fred?

I've e-mailed my photo today to PhotoPage @ gmail DOT com.

I don't know whether Dave (DBH) is still with us, as it appears he has not posted for nearly 3 years now?

Anyone know?

David · 3 Jan 2012, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FredOnline

I've e-mailed my photo today to PhotoPage @ gmail DOT com.

I don't know whether Dave (DBH) is still with us, as it appears he has not posted for nearly 3 years now?

Anyone know?

Although Dave only posts rarely, he usually appears after a post to this thread (after a few days at the most) Hopefully he will read his mail and post here soon

robert@fm · 3 Jan 2012, 03:55 AM

Just re-read the enitre thread.

12 pages long for me, because I have my thread view set to 40 posts per page.

Have to laugh at the comment at the bottom of this post; it also reminds me that my pic is long overdue for updating, as the present one is over 10 years old(!) and my beard is now grey. And I'm supposed to be clean-shaven anyway, so that my CPAP mask would fit better...

Some pictures seem to have disappeared without explanation in this thread -- I particularly miss dragon1.

Webgenie · 3 Jan 2012, 04:55 AM

I just now e-mailed my updated photo, but first had to look and see my "old" self...LOL. The new one was taken when my husband and I were celebrating at my favorite Italian cafe, Strings.

B4its2L8 · 3 Jan 2012, 05:07 AM

I wonder why Web Of Trust gives the photo page such an abysmal rating.

janusz · 3 Jan 2012, 05:16 AM

It shows how much you can trust Web Of Trust

robert@fm · 3 Jan 2012, 06:26 AM

Those Web Of Trust ratings are mind-boggling.

OK, "Privacy: Very poor" is understandable (but irrelevant), since it's a photo-gallery page and its whole reason for being is to publish those pictures, but:

Trustworthiness: Unsatisfactory? What is there to trust? It's just a photo gallery -- this rating should be "N/A" or "irrelevant".
Vendor Reliability: Poor? What vendor? It's a gallery, not a sales site; see above.
Child Safety: Poor? What is there on this page that makes it unsafe for children?

Hence I'd like to add my own ratings:
Usefulness of WoT ratings: Zero
Relevance of WoT ratings: Zero
Trustworthiness of WoT: Zero

Malc 44 · 3 Jan 2012, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David

Although Dave only posts rarely, he usually appears after a post to this thread (after a few days at the most) Hopefully he will read his mail and post here soon

If or when Dave is active again, I will send in my updated photo too

janusz · 3 Jan 2012, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malc 44

I will send in my updated photo

Will it be trustworthy & safe for children?

robert@fm · 3 Jan 2012, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malc 44

If or when Dave is active again, I will send in my updated photo too

Quote:

Originally Posted by janusz

Will it be trustworthy & safe for children?

If it's for sale, will it be reliable?

Webgenie · 4 Feb 2012, 02:49 PM

I really hate spam and don't appreciate it. How'd you get all those posts? Are you a multitasking spammer?

robert@fm · 7 Feb 2012, 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webgenie

I really hate spam and don't appreciate it. How'd you get all those posts? Are you a multitasking spammer?

I presume you're replying to a series of posts which the mods have deleted.

Certainly if a number of posts are made in a short time, that usually means a spammer -- I could tell, from the "New Posts" list alone, that the latest spammer(s) (honeybytha and mitchel -- I suspect they're the same person) were such.

FredOnline · 7 Feb 2012, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robert@fm

I presume you're replying to a series of posts which the mods have deleted

Yes, Robert. I saw them at the time . . . there were quite a LOT unfortunately.

My personal response is not to reply in the forum (they'll be long gone anyway) but to report it as spam.

robert@fm · 7 Feb 2012, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FredOnline

My personal response is not to reply in the forum (they'll be long gone anyway) but to report it as spam.

I totally agree, since spam is destined to be deleted it's utterly pointless to reply to it.

One of today's spammers (mitchel) replied to the fruit-quiz thread "i'm a banana lol" to which I was sorely tempted to reply "no you're not, you're a spammer". But of course I didn't.

Webgenie · 7 Feb 2012, 07:33 AM

You guys are right; I shoulda just reported it. Can't help myself sometimes

3 Jan 2012, 04:55 AM	#469
Webgenie Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CA USA Posts: 151	Updated I just now e-mailed my updated photo, but first had to look and see my "old" self...LOL. The new one was taken when my husband and I were celebrating at my favorite Italian cafe, Strings.

3 Jan 2012, 06:26 AM	#472
robert@fm The "e" in e-mail Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: London, UK Posts: 4,681	Those Web Of Trust ratings are mind-boggling. OK, "Privacy: Very poor" is understandable (but irrelevant), since it's a photo-gallery page and its whole reason for being is to publish those pictures, but: Trustworthiness: Unsatisfactory? What is there to trust? It's just a photo gallery -- this rating should be "N/A" or "irrelevant". Vendor Reliability: Poor? What vendor? It's a gallery, not a sales site; see above. Child Safety: Poor? What is there on this page that makes it unsafe for children? Hence I'd like to add my own ratings: Usefulness of WoT ratings: Zero Relevance of WoT ratings: Zero Trustworthiness of WoT: Zero

4 Feb 2012, 02:49 PM	#476
Webgenie Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CA USA Posts: 151	Not appreciated I really hate spam and don't appreciate it. How'd you get all those posts? Are you a multitasking spammer?

7 Feb 2012, 07:33 AM	#480
Webgenie Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CA USA Posts: 151	Annoyances You guys are right; I shoulda just reported it. Can't help myself sometimes

3 Jan 2012, 03:55 AM	#468
robert@fm The "e" in e-mail Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: London, UK Posts: 4,681	Just re-read the enitre thread. 12 pages long for me, because I have my thread view set to 40 posts per page. Have to laugh at the comment at the bottom of this post; it also reminds me that my pic is long overdue for updating, as the present one is over 10 years old(!) and my beard is now grey. And I'm supposed to be clean-shaven anyway, so that my CPAP mask would fit better... Some pictures seem to have disappeared without explanation in this thread -- I particularly miss dragon1.

3 Jan 2012, 05:07 AM	#470
B4its2L8 Master of the @ Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Hiding under my bed Posts: 1,465	I wonder why Web Of Trust gives the photo page such an abysmal rating.

3 Jan 2012, 05:16 AM	#471
janusz The "e" in e-mail Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: EU Posts: 4,962	It shows how much you can trust Web Of Trust