![]() |
|
Email Comments, Questions and Miscellaneous Share your opinion of the email service you're using. Post general email questions and discussions that don't fit elsewhere. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
New email service OnMail
Frome the makers of the Edison email app. https://www.onmail.com/
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,092
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
Mail service. Read more about it here: https://medium.com/changing-communic...e-5ad72328d4c4
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
Interesting idea to have the ability to make it so that you can choose who you want to receive email from, but I wonder how it will work for the first email received? In other words, you sign up for some service and they always want to send you an email to confirm, but you don't usually know the exact address it will be coming from. Plus, I have found that companies I want to hear from change their email addresses all the time, making it extremely inconvenient to only accept a particular address from the company. Sometimes emails come from different addresses in the same thread. I guess we will find out eventually how this is supposed to work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,919
|
Pure speculation: it's conceivable you allow emails from all subdomains for your potential correspondent. For example, you buy something from example.com and you designate example.com as an allowed sender. Then messages from sales.example.com, support.example.com, news.example.com would be accepted.
Wait and see, and speculate in the meantime ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in between the bright lights and the far unlit unknown
Posts: 2,323
|
Interesting concept for sure. Instead of marking the email addresses you don't want to receive from and block them, you mark those addresses that are allowed to email you.
I think this would be perfect for someone who needs an account just to communicate with close friends, family etc in all privacy ; only people (s)he knows the email address from. Of course you'd need an additional mailbox for receiving mails of people whose email address is unknown to you (for example to sign up for a forum or mailinglist, or if someone promises you "one of my colleagues will email you" etc). But for private communication with friends and family only, people you know the email address from, it looks very interesting. Adding an entire domain as OK to accept emails from can be tricky, you can maybe do that with the domainname of your employer or your local sports club you're member of, but the moment someone would --without thinking-- whitelist all gmail.com addresses or hotmail.com addresses, the concept loses its power. In other words: excellent for some purposes, but a secondary email account is needed for those mails not being amongst those purposes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
One issue I see right away is that people I regularly correspond with use multiple email addresses, and they change email addresses often. Even close friends. I'm one of the worst offenders since I have so many email addresses. Another problem might be newsletters you want to receive but only come out once in awhile--it would be easy to forget to somehow whitelist those. I have some that only come once a month or less.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Macao
Posts: 2,092
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
Quote:
Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 806
|
This is a new era, where blocking option is more highlighted.
in same way, hey.com was introduced. Wait for a few days, Google and Microsoft will come with the same feature. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Master of the @
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,919
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK (East Anglia)
Posts: 726
|
What happened to me was that I had to sign up first. Then they offered a free and a range of paid accounts. The free one required an invitation. Not quite what I expected from their blurb.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 713
|
Agreed with ankupan -- and the similarities will continue to grow with services like HEY.COM, and it's just a matter of time that some of these features will make it into the large providers too. OnMail, HEY.COM, Superhuman, etc., all have lots of good (and similar) ideas, so it's exciting to see email evolve like this IMO, but other providers are already picking up on these ideas. Even veterans like Fastmail seem to be noticing -- https://fastmail.blog/2020/07/24/email-workflow/
I do think it's the beginning of a new era. For me, OnMail already raised a big personal red flag though -- YMMV, but I did not like the privacy policy. HEY.COM and Fastmail have far better policies and approaches IMO. In particular are OnMail's/Edison's policies regarding email analysis and usage for their Edison Trends product. And while you can theoretically opt out of Edison Trends, the policy did not give me much comfort about how much collection and analysis has actually been going on at Edison, and how strong those boundaries really are between products. Sounds like Google-lite to me. Reading through https://www.edison.tech/privacy did not inspire the same level of trust I get from Fastmail's or HEY's policies. You won't see anything like this in Fastmail's or HEY's policies (I've highlighted some things in bold): Quote:
Does this mean that it's on by default? If so, that's troubling. And, it looks like they also can connect your email with your social media accounts. To assuage those who might be concerned about all this, they explain how this data collection is different than selling personal information here: Quote:
There is plenty more in there of concern to anyone who cares about privacy. However, I'll admit it is at least better than Google. It's Google-lite. So if someone is already happy with GMail, then this will be a step up in terms of privacy policies. But again, Fastmail and HEY.COM are far better in terms of their policies IMO. Last edited by ioneja : 2 Oct 2020 at 06:20 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 82
|
I would like an invite too. Can anyone spare me one? Much appreciated
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|