EmailDiscussions.com  

Go Back   EmailDiscussions.com > Miscellaneous > The Off-Topic Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Stay in touch wirelessly

The Off-Topic Lounge APPROPRIATE FAMILY-FRIENDLY TOPICS ONLY - READ THE RULES!
This forum is for posting anything (excluding topics prohibited by the forum rules) that's unrelated to email. General discussions, in other words.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25 Oct 2024, 10:31 PM   #1
janusz
The "e" in e-mail
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 4,970
Excel just entered its 40th year

Quote:
More senior than Windows itself, and still runs the world

Microsoft Excel Version 1.0 was released on the last day of September 1985, four decades ago.

Excel 1 was a Mac application, and originally a Mac-only application. The first Windows version only followed a few years later, when in 1987 Microsoft ported Excel 2 to Windows.

Excel will still cost you a few hundred bucks. That may be the best tribute to its staying power
Source: The Register
janusz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 26 Oct 2024, 12:45 AM   #2
CyberSmurf
 Moderator 
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 4,043
I remember when Excel for Windows and Word for Windows came with a bare bones version of Windows.
CyberSmurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 Oct 2024, 01:59 AM   #3
CyberSmurf
 Moderator 
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 4,043
Interesting thing about Excel is that it did not take into account that there was no February 29th in the year 1900.

In Excel, day 1 was January 1st 1900.
When Microsoft released Access, they synced the dates on March 1st 1900 as day 61. In Access this means day 1 is December 31st 1899.

I discovered this on February 29th, 2000. I was running a routine in Access involving the DOS mm-dd-yy timestamp on files. The routine wasn't Y2K compatible, but it didn't matter. Except for that day where my function generated an error message.
For me it was serendipity because I had written a database where I used the day numbers and I couldn't understand why day 1 was December 31st 1899.
CyberSmurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 Oct 2024, 07:51 AM   #4
hadaso
The "e" in e-mail
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Holon, Israel.
Posts: 4,992
John Walker writes about the MS Excel 29 February 1900 bug and more on dates in Excel here in his Fourmilab's Calendar Converter.
hadaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Oct 2024, 11:36 AM   #5
Grhm
Essential Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 282
Excel is great, but it would be even greater if they had stuck with and extended the original concept, instead of shoehorning in ugly new features that undermined its logical structure.

For example:

Giving the columns letters instead of numbers. (How many cells to the right of column Q is column AH?! Ridiculous.)

Introducing "merged cells", which prevent you from selecting a single column or row, instead of extending the principle of "center across columns" so that you could, for example "center down rows" or "right align across columns".

Changing the way lines on cell borders were defined so that it became ambiguous.

Abandoning the straightforward and elegant Excel 5 Macro language and replacing it with the cumbersome and hard-to-understand "Visual Basic".

I could go on.

...And I often do !

Last edited by Grhm : 30 Oct 2024 at 11:51 AM.
Grhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 02:57 AM.

 

Copyright EmailDiscussions.com 1998-2022. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy